Posting tweet...
Powered by Twitter Tools
All of those who knowingly profit from anything that causes human suffering, illness, and eventually deaths, like representing corporate interest over people’s, denying coverage and/or claims for insurance, polluting with dirty energy, cutting benefits & wages & jobs, etc., are committing mass manslaughter, at least, if not premeditated mass murder, and should have class-action lawsuits filed against them by the citizenry and should be tried and sentenced (executed) for crimes against humanity.
In Dallas Morning New’s story “Texas under fire over processing times for food stamp applications“, it is reported that:
AUSTIN – The federal agency that oversees food stamps wants Texas to stop fingerprinting applicants as a way to save resources and speed up what the agency says is an unacceptably slow application system. But because Texas law requires the fingerprinting, the state’s Health and Human Services Commission finds itself caught between what the Legislature requires and what federal officials want. “One of the things I think Texas needs to do is streamline their operations,” said William Ludwig, a regional administrator for the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food and Nutrition Service. “Finger imaging is very time-consuming.” Texas is one of four states with such a requirement, which supporters – including Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst – say prevents people from collecting benefits under more than one name. Critics have said it is invasive, a waste of money and seeks to solve a problem that doesn’t exist. The electronic fingerprinting costs $3 million a year: $1.6 million for Cogent Systems’ contract for the imaging and $1.4 million for state workers’ time. The state and federal governments split the cost. Last year, the fingerprint program led to the state investigating four applicants for fraud. But state officials say it’s impossible to know how many people are deterred from applying multiple times because of the fingerprinting. Ludwig told Texas officials last week in a letter that the state’s federal funds will be at risk if it doesn’t speed up its application processing. The federal government pays for all the food and splits administrative costs with the state. Stephanie Goodman, a spokeswoman for the Health and Human Services Commission, said officials will consider eliminating fingerprinting but because it is done relatively quickly, “we really don’t think it helps this particular problem very much.” [reprinted from the Austin American-Statesman 2009-10-02]
AUSTIN – The federal agency that oversees food stamps wants Texas to stop fingerprinting applicants as a way to save resources and speed up what the agency says is an unacceptably slow application system. But because Texas law requires the fingerprinting, the state’s Health and Human Services Commission finds itself caught between what the Legislature requires and what federal officials want.
“One of the things I think Texas needs to do is streamline their operations,” said William Ludwig, a regional administrator for the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food and Nutrition Service. “Finger imaging is very time-consuming.”
Texas is one of four states with such a requirement, which supporters – including Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst – say prevents people from collecting benefits under more than one name.
Critics have said it is invasive, a waste of money and seeks to solve a problem that doesn’t exist.
The electronic fingerprinting costs $3 million a year: $1.6 million for Cogent Systems’ contract for the imaging and $1.4 million for state workers’ time. The state and federal governments split the cost.
Last year, the fingerprint program led to the state investigating four applicants for fraud. But state officials say it’s impossible to know how many people are deterred from applying multiple times because of the fingerprinting.
Ludwig told Texas officials last week in a letter that the state’s federal funds will be at risk if it doesn’t speed up its application processing. The federal government pays for all the food and splits administrative costs with the state.
Stephanie Goodman, a spokeswoman for the Health and Human Services Commission, said officials will consider eliminating fingerprinting but because it is done relatively quickly, “we really don’t think it helps this particular problem very much.”
[reprinted from the Austin American-Statesman 2009-10-02]
Most of the people posting comments are, of course, Conservative Republicans (I am in Texas, after all). Most of the respondents are of the opinion that because some people (a very few) commit fraud to get benefits, or misuse benefits once they have received them, that the program should be gotten rid of completely. This viewpoint is extremely insensitive to fellow human beings and ignorant of economic realities. I will now explain why…
There are some people who commit fraud to get benefits, or who misuse benefits, but there are a great many more who legitimately need help (more every day), mostly due to inflation caused by the greed of those in power who control the wealth and over time charge more for everything but pay the same or less.
The previous times that I have visited my local Health and Human Services office (in McKinney), there were tables to fill out forms, and a few chairs around each, and a few dozen people (max) waiting to be seen. The last few times (in recent weeks), there are only chairs, and hundreds of people filling the room, hungry, and sick with the flu, and wrapped around the block waiting to get in. It’s not because a lot more people suddenly decided to quit their jobs and let you support them with your precious taxes; it’s because the people that supposedly represent them (local, state, and federal) and the people who employee(d) constantly want and take more for themselves, at the expense of the people whose labor makes them rich.
I’m a single parent (white male) who has worked hard all of my adult life, and due to work-related back injuries and trouble finding full time work with benefits, I have had to use public assistance several times, even while working 2 jobs up to 7 days a week, just to barely be able to feed myself and my son and pay rent and electricity.
Here is my message to the hateful who have no sympathy for those less fortunate than themselves:
Those of you who are privileged enough to sit in luxury in big homes and drive around in gas guzzling trucks and SUVs (polluting and promoting the need for war) and cast judgment should count yourselves lucky, but not superior. A few unfortunate events and/or a few little mistakes in life, and you too could need help. That’s a fact that conservatives (fiscal and social) like to ignore. You are brainwashed by your leaders to think that just because you are white and Christian and racist like they are, that you too will someday get promoted up the ladder, or make your small business a big corporation, or get elected to office, or make it big in some other way (as a football player or country music singer?), so you support their selfish, vicious, imperial capitalism either because you also benefit from it, or because you think that you eventually will. Those of you who spew hate against food benefits and medicaid and health care reform, decrying them as the evil of “socialism” should keep in mind that public schools and libraries and police and fire departments and paramedics and parks and water districts and the US military are socialist, and not private corporate for-profit entities. Should we dissolve these services and make everything private? It appears we already are with the rise of private prisons, police, and mercenary armies. Those things don’t inspire patriotism for American for me. Those of you who say that there should be no welfare or food stamp benefits of any kind should consider that as time goes on, and more people are unemployed or underemployed and uninsured or under insured and losing their cars and homes, you may be joining the ranks of those you see as slackers and leaches. If you someday get downsized, or ill or injured, lose your insurance, lose your jobs, and end up homeless and hungry in the pro-corporate anti-human system that you propose, perhaps only then will you understand how naive your hateful self-righteousness really is. Let’s see if you still support the same corrupt politicians who get millions in campaign contributions and lobbying and secret bribes from big companies to pass and support laws that benefit the rich when you too, are poor. I sincerely hope that you either take a look at your ideas and realize how hateful and ignorant and arrogant you are, and realize that you are not immune to the conditions of those whom you detest, and stop discriminating against your brothers and sisters who aren’t as successful, or that bad fortune befalls you and teaches you firsthand what it’s like to be one of the have-nots. Only then will karma be served.
Those of you who are privileged enough to sit in luxury in big homes and drive around in gas guzzling trucks and SUVs (polluting and promoting the need for war) and cast judgment should count yourselves lucky, but not superior. A few unfortunate events and/or a few little mistakes in life, and you too could need help. That’s a fact that conservatives (fiscal and social) like to ignore. You are brainwashed by your leaders to think that just because you are white and Christian and racist like they are, that you too will someday get promoted up the ladder, or make your small business a big corporation, or get elected to office, or make it big in some other way (as a football player or country music singer?), so you support their selfish, vicious, imperial capitalism either because you also benefit from it, or because you think that you eventually will.
Those of you who spew hate against food benefits and medicaid and health care reform, decrying them as the evil of “socialism” should keep in mind that public schools and libraries and police and fire departments and paramedics and parks and water districts and the US military are socialist, and not private corporate for-profit entities. Should we dissolve these services and make everything private? It appears we already are with the rise of private prisons, police, and mercenary armies. Those things don’t inspire patriotism for American for me.
Those of you who say that there should be no welfare or food stamp benefits of any kind should consider that as time goes on, and more people are unemployed or underemployed and uninsured or under insured and losing their cars and homes, you may be joining the ranks of those you see as slackers and leaches. If you someday get downsized, or ill or injured, lose your insurance, lose your jobs, and end up homeless and hungry in the pro-corporate anti-human system that you propose, perhaps only then will you understand how naive your hateful self-righteousness really is. Let’s see if you still support the same corrupt politicians who get millions in campaign contributions and lobbying and secret bribes from big companies to pass and support laws that benefit the rich when you too, are poor.
I sincerely hope that you either take a look at your ideas and realize how hateful and ignorant and arrogant you are, and realize that you are not immune to the conditions of those whom you detest, and stop discriminating against your brothers and sisters who aren’t as successful, or that bad fortune befalls you and teaches you firsthand what it’s like to be one of the have-nots. Only then will karma be served.
Before calling the help center, be sure not to use common sense, making sure that things are plugged in and that you have electricity, etc. Also, don’t try simple things like rebooting your computer. It’s better to waste the time of the agent and of other callers while your ancient machine slowly shuts down and restarts.
Never consult your products paper or electronic manual, or search for solutions on the company’s website or elsewhere on the Internet. That kind of pro-active self help is just plain stupid. Why bother, right?
If the person taking your call has an accent different from yours, instead of listening carefully to understand them, and appreciate their help, instead immediately decide that they are less intelligent than yourself, and are a “rude foreigner”. If the call center taking your call is in your own country and speaks your own language, don’t worry, it probably won’t be for long, as mega companies exploit cheap labor at the expense of their own countries workers and customers. Thank your political representative for ensuring that is stays this way.
If you have to wait on hold for longer than you like, or be transferred, waste even more of your valuable time telling the representative how much of your valuable time has already been wasted. Make sure they understand, even if it takes 30 to 45 minutes, that you are very angry about having had to wait for 30 to 45 minutes. If you waste as much of their time as you already waited, perhaps then they will truly understand your situation, and will champion your cause, all the way to the corporate executive, and get more reps hired to decrease call times. Or perhaps they will just be less likely to want to help or understand you. Either way, you can be consoled by the fact that you have just contributed to the hold time of the people after you in the queue.
If you are informed, after explaining your issue, that you have either reached the wrong department, or that due to the info that you have provided, it has been realized that another department might better help you, become agitated and unreasonable, and insist that whomever you are speaking to, regardless of training, experience, qualification, or authorization, be the one who helps you. This will immediately ingratiate you to the representative, letting them know that you are willing to help yourself to fix this problem. If the rep still insists on escalating or transferring the call, waste more of your time (and everyone else’s) by holding for a supervisor, so they can tell you the same thing and then transfer you anyway, or waste more of your time by trying to help you, when they have less experience than the agent who was originally trying to help you.
When a representative is attempting to assist you with your issue, by all means, do not listen or follow instructions. Skip ahead to what you think they are going to have you try, start trying random things, and/or do what the last person you talked to had you try. This will ensure that your problem becomes worse, strengthening the desperate bond between customer and agent. Then, while the rep is explaining what you should be seeing, instructing you where to look, look elsewhere and repeatedly insist that they are wrong or that is not on your screen. Then finally, realizing that you are stupid, say “that’s weird; now it’s there”
While on the phone with a representative, yell at your pets, kids, spouse or roommates, or alternatively, tell an interesting story about your life. Technical support is widely known to be a synonym for “emotional support”. Don’t waste the time of the people at the dating service or the suicide hotline.
If the agent is of the opposite sex (or the same, if that be your fancy), then, by all means, make suggestive comments, ask embarrassing personal questions, and finally, engage in awkward sexual advances, offers, or boastful claims. If this doesn’t get you hung up on or transferred, and the rep helps you anyway, then, regardless of their tone, assume that they are into you, and ask for them by name next time, naively assuming that the next time you call, you are speaking to a person sitting next to them, rather than someone in another building possibly in another country.
If the agent is of a gender or race or culture that you consider to be incompetent or otherwise inferior, be condescending and abusive, or even ask to be helped by someone of your own kind. If the agent sounds younger than yourself, assume that they are inexperienced and won’t be able to help you, and be insulting or ask to be helped by someone else. If the agent sounds older than yourself, assume that they are antiquated and out of touch with current issues, products, and techniques, and be abusive or ask to be helped by someone else. This kind of self righteousness is the kind of classy that never goes out of style, and when the agent transfers you, explaining what an ass you are, you can be sure that their friend will do everything possible to help you!
When making reservations, lie about the size of your party to score a big spacious table with shoulder room. That way, if the establishment seats your (supposedly) incomplete party, you can enjoy your breathing room, taking comfort in the fact that the server is going to make less tips and the eatery is going to have people waiting or being turned away because of unused seats. Don’t sweat it.
If you enter and are not immediately greeted by the host, hostess, waiter, waitress, or a manager, seat yourself and your party and just assume that someone will know that you need service, especially when the restaurant is full and busy. This way, when someone comes to the table, you can complain, or, even better, if you have to wait a while for someone and/or go looking for help, you can complain even more.
When your server first comes to the table, be sure to either ignore them completely, continuing your conversation (which is best if loud and offensive), or, alternatively, begin the exchange with some kind of insulting statement or aggressive ultimatum about how you expect better service and/or food than last time. Just assume that your server is as incompetent or inattentive as whomever has served you poorly in the past. Don’t even give them a chance!
Don’t bother remembering the name of the person helping you, especially when they have a name tag. That way, when you ask someone else to help you or to get your server or to let your server know you want something, you can come up with an interesting, hopefully personally slanderous description of your server, and hope the other employee can derive from this whom you are talking about.
If you find your server physically attractive, make them uncomfortable by undressing them with your eyes, winking, making inappropriate (sexually suggestive) comments and/or advances, or possibly even attempting to grope or fondle them. Assume that if you tip them well, especially over the course of multiple visits, that they will eventually realize that they should go out with you, have sex with you, marry you, or whatever it is that you are dreaming of. This kind of thing seems classiest when you have been drinking and can blame the alcohol…
If you are racist, sexist, or ageist, be sure to make this obvious in your treatment of your server. And be loud enough about it so that not only those in your party, but even other tables and workers get the full effect of your small minded abuse.
Never explain up front whether you want one or separate checks. That makes it too easy. And if the server bothers to ask, so they can keep track of what each person is ordering (especially for large parties), tell them it will be one check, and then at the end change your mind. It takes forever, and is fun for everybody!
Why bother ordering a soda or lemonade when you can just order water and keep asking for more sugar and/or lemons? Be cheap. Rip them off. They will remember and love you for it! It’s also fun to order a drink you’ve never tried, without so much as asking for a description or sample, and then ask for something else, and to not be charged for the drink you are wasting.
Never, ever order anything the way it comes. Always ask for less, more, or some kind of alteration or substitution. Not only is it quite often insulting to the chef who created the combinations, but it’s hard to explain to the kitchen workers and any other servers who might run the food for your server.
Don’t waste your breath asking that things you don’t like and don’t intend to eat be left off your order. It’s just food, after all. The more that gets bought, prepared, and then wasted, becoming methane producing landfill fodder (contributing to global warming), the better! It takes way too much effort to ask the server to leave off that side item you don’t care for…
If you’ve talked to the manager, even once, always tell your server how you are friends with them, and how they always let you order things your special way or give you a special discount. It’s fun for the server when they go to verify with the manager and get to hear about how presumptuous you are.
If your server doesn’t come around to check on you often enough to keep you stocked with what you need to enjoy your visit, instead of politely asking them if they need to ask someone else for help, or mentioning to a manager that they look like they are busy and working hard need less tables or more assistance, instead become irrationally angry and make a big scene. That will allow your server to run faster and force their other customers and the cooks in the kitchen to not make them wait so long on orders, payments, and food, so they can help you better.
If your server comes around more often than you would like, instead of politely informing them that you are all doing fine and they don’t need to worry about you again for “X” number of minutes or until you signal them, become enraged and complain about wanting peace, privacy, or whatever, and then inform them that their bothering you is going to negatively affect their tip. This will make you a favorite!
When paying your bill, make it unclear whether you are waiting on the server to ring you out, by not placing your credit card in the (visible) slot provided. As your server makes passes by and/or watches from a distance, don’t indicate with any kind of signal or body language when you are ready to pay, or when your payment is ready. That way, you waste your time and their’s, and it gives you something else to complain about.
When paying with cash, either use as large a bill as possible, so the server will probably have to get change from another server, the bar, the manager, or the office, or use lots of small change, and don’t explain that the loose coins will fall out of the tray (under the bills) or out of the book the receipt was in. Either way, you waste more time and make the server look and feel incompetent.
When tipping, if you even bother with such nonsense at all, always leave the bare minimum. Try to get away with 10% (or less?), but never go over 15%. I mean, come on, a lot of these servers are making up to $2.25 an hour! Why contribute to their unfair wealth by giving them even more?
After your meal, stay as long as possible without ordering anything else. If you want to have a 2 or 3 hour conversation, don’t bother going to a bar or home; stay and occupy a table, so the server makes less tips for the day and thus will have even more problems paying their overwhelming bills. This is especially helpful if the server has a small section, and/or other parties are also “camping” at their other tables.
If something about your experience is less than perfect, instead of letting your server and/or the management know about it, just go out in the world and talk trash about the establishment, and/or go online and write a nasty review or blog. That’s mature, and kind!
When employees give you answers to your questions that you don’t find acceptable, especially when they are obviously regurgitating company policy which has been drilled into their skulls by management, always request a manager. Either the supervisor will cave in for public relation purposes and grant you whatever ridiculous solution your greedy heart desires, demeaning the clerk in the process, or they will stand firm in support of the stance that their underling took, letting you leave the store in a huff of righteous indignation. In any event, you win.
Be sure to complain to each employee, and possibly management about how there are not enough workers, even though they know this even better than you do. Also, delay your own transaction and those of the people behind you by going off on a rant about how long you have waited in line, wasting even more of your time, instead of thanking the person who is trying to get you the fuck out of the store for helping you. Ignore the evil looks and sighs and angry talking between the other customers as you make a total ass of yourself. Don’t bother calling the CEO, who is making more money by not hiring enough people to help their customers.
While shopping, and using fitting rooms, (where applicable) please never put anything back where you found it. This makes earning an unlivable wage all the more pleasant for the wage-slave, and serves as training for employees, helping them get to know the department. It is especially helpful, to throw things on the floor. This is particularly considerate of injured, disabled, and older employees, as well as other customers who might be looking for the item that you obviously were not.
If you have any children, please ensure that they are loud, rude, and completely out of control at all times. Let them climb on dangerous fixtures, creating massive spills for employees to clean up, ensuring future job security, as well as a pleasant experience for fellow shoppers. Also, it is helpful to let your kids rip open packages and scatter toys about, so that they might be thrown away, resulting in corporate loss (which helps with layoffs and lower wages), or discounted severely, which is great for less fortunate shoppers.
Don’t bother deciding what you are actually going to purchase during the shopping process, instead bring it with you, and throw it all around the cashier area, or stand and make others wait as you deliberate and finally hand it to the cashier for them to put away your mess for minimum wage.
When you find an item with no price, don’t bother employees on the sales floor who know the area and items, instead ask the cashier, who will then call the salespeople to help you while other customers stand and curse you and the cashier stresses and nods apologetically to the other customers as they attempt to not hit or strangle you.
When you find an item without a price tag, say “I guess it’s free then” and laugh, expecting the employee, who has heard this several million times to find it as amusing as the first time.
When attempting to purchase an item, always ask if the price indicated is actually the price. You never know, that $100 jacket might be on sale today only for $0.99!
When asking for a possible mark-down on a slightly imperfect item, especially when the said item is already shown to be marked down, don’t trouble the workers on the sales floor. Instead wait until checking out, so the other customer in line can benefit from your entertaining bartering with the manager, when the manager finally comes out of hiding to help the cashier.
When returning an item, be sure to either misplace the receipt, (preferably not realizing that until looking through your stack of receipts in your wallet or purse at the register as everyone waits) or if you do have the receipt, be sure that it is faded and crumpled beyond any recognition, so the cashier will be unable to scan the bar code or read any pertinent information required to complete your return. That way you can both enjoy the wait for a manager, together.
When returning an item, also be sure to lose or destroy any and all original packaging, and preferably also any tag indicating brand, model, and price. If at all possible be sure the item looks and functions as if it has been used, so the cashier must wait for a manager to argue with you but finally give in and give you what you want, which is of course credit for something that either didn’t even come from this store, or that you got here and used for months or years, and now want to get something else with, that you will also return at a later date, in similar condition, and likely at another store.
When using the restrooms, be as dirty as you wanna be. It is polite to draw and/or carve graffiti, using markers, feces, knives, or spray paint. This can be done on mirrors, fixtures (hand dryers, change tables), and the doors and walls of stalls. Be creative; your audience will thank you for it. Include misspelled praises of Satan (Satin), claims of sexual fortitude and prowess, phone numbers of any promiscuous person you know of, gang slogans and logos, and racial slurs and threats. Nothing improves the experience of shitting in public more than a little light reading or writing, and you can leave satisfied in the knowledge that some poor wage-slave will have to clean your feces cave drawings, or repaint over your offensive, albeit quite creative endeavors.
reprinted from David Malmo-Levine’s blog @ http://cannabisculture.com/v2/blog/22
Tuesday, August 25 2009
Caffeine or cannabis –which drug is more dangerous?
THE SLIPPERY SLOPE…
“…it is sufficient in this regard for Parliament to have a reasonable basis for concluding that harm (to society) will result and this requirement does not demand actual proof of harm.” –R. v. Butler, 1992, Supreme Court of Canada case about “obscene” pornography
So, what is the minimum level of harm to society necessary before the government can criminalize an activity ? Where do we draw the line? How much freedom is too much for this world’s people at the dawn of a new millennium? If we draw the line as low as cannabis smoking – anything more risky than toking some pot and the government has the right to prohibit it – then earth will become a world of slaves and small children.
NEARLY EVERYTHING IS MORE RISKY THAN CANNABIS SMOKING!!!
Horseback riding, canoeing, driving down the highway, breathing city air, watching too much TV, missing sleep, eating lots of red meat or even drinking three or four cups of coffee every day – each of these common activities may one day be viewed as posing an “unacceptable” risk level by some well-meaning, health conscious politician or judge.
Take coffee for example. Caffeine is the best drug to compare with cannabis, considering they are both low-risk stimulants.
OVERDOSE DEATHS: CAFFEINE HAS MORE
Caffeine, six recorded deaths in the United States. (Maisto, Galizio, Connors, “Drug Use and Misuse”, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, 1991, p.162)
Cannabis: zero – worldwide. (Testimony of Dr. Kalant, Jan. 30, 1997, R. v. Clay, see also Robert Clarke and David Pate, “Medical Marijuana” Journal of the International Hemp Association, Volume 1, Number 1, 1994, p.9)
One would each have to orally ingest about a pound and a half of high-grade bud (Clarke & Pate, Journal of the International Hemp Association,, Vol. 1, #1, 1994, p.10) or smoke over 15 pounds within 15 minutes (Ex-Drug Enforcement Agency Administrative Law Judge Francis L. Young, 1988, taken from “Marijuana – Not Guilty As Charged”, D.R. Ford, Good Press, 1997, p. 238) to even risk death from too much cannabis, but it would only take you 50 tiny 200mg “Wake-up” caffeine pills to O.D. on caffeine, or 40 cups of coffee (Richard J. Gilbert Ph.D., “Caffeine – The Most Popular Stimulant”, from the Encyclopedia of Psychoactive Drugs, 1986, Burke Publishing Company Limited, p.94), maybe 20 double-espressos – even less for a child.
OVERUSE DEATHS: CAFFEINE HAS MORE
Caffeine kills 1000 to 10000 people every year in the United States, from “stress, ulcers and triggering irregular heartbeats”. (U.S. Bureau of Mortality Statistics and the National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1988, taken from Jack Herer, The Emperor Wears No Cloths, HEMP Publishing, 1993-94, back cover.)
Again cannabis is zero. (See information above)
WITHDRAWAL SYMPTOMS: CAFFEINE’S ARE MORE SERIOUS
Caffeine offers the famous headache. (Richard J. Gilbert Ph.D., “Caffeine – The Most Popular Stimulant”, from the Encyclopedia of Psychoactive Drugs, 1986, Burke Publishing Company Limited, pp. 93, 99, 100)
With cannabis; “If people experience withdrawal symptoms at all, they are remarkably mild.” (Drs. Zimmer & Morgan, Marijuana Myths-Marijuana Facts, 1997, p. 26:
ACUTE EFFECTS: CAFFEINE’S EFFECTS ARE MORE SERIOUS
Acute effects are immediate health problems that may result from misuse – including impairment.
Caffeine “significantly increases the blood pressure in subjects who have been without the drug for some days”, causes “palpitations” in those who have had such heart conditions in the past, can lead to “digestive upset” and “ulcers”. Larger doses can lead to “hyperventilation”, “rapid heartbeat”, “convulsions”, “rapid, uncoordinated twitching of the heart”. (Richard J. Gilbert Ph.D., “Caffeine – The Most Popular Stimulant”, from the Encyclopedia of Psychoactive Drugs, 1986, Burke Publishing Company Limited, pp. 86-95)
Cannabis “acute toxicity is low compared with that of any other drugs” (1977 Commission of the Australian Government, from Zimmer and Morgan, Marijuana Myths, Marijuana Facts, pp pre-1 and 150)
Cognitive impairment, psycho-motor impairment, anxiety, dysphoria, panic and paranoia, chronic bronchitis, and a “dependence syndrome” (1994 Australian National Drug Strategy Report)
LONG-TERM EFFECTS: CAFFEINE EFFECTS ARE MORE SERIOUS
Every other British Adult may be dependent on caffeine and use it at least in part to ward off withdrawal symptoms. And about 1 in 5 adults may regularly use enough caffeine to cause physical harm, notably heart disease, bladder cancer in males and behavioral disorders. (Richard J. Gilbert Ph.D., “Caffeine – The Most Popular Stimulant”, from the Encyclopedia of Psychoactive Drugs, 1986, Burke Publishing Company Limited, p. 123)
With cannabis; “There are no significant problems concerns with respect to the low/occasional/moderate adult heavy user” “the major probable adverse effects on chronic heavy cannabis users appear to be: “respiratory disease” such as “chronic bronchitis”, a “dependence syndrome” and “Subtle forms of cognitive impairment.” (1994 Australian National Drug Strategy Report) The author would add that this is most likely only from misuse, not proper chronic heavy cannabis use.
DIRECT COMPARISONS – DEPENDENCE, WITHDRAWAL, TOLERANCE
In 1994, Dr. Jack E Henningfield of the National Institute on Drug Abuse and Dr. Neal L. Benowitz of the University of California ranked six substances based on five problem areas. The substances were nicotine, heroin, cocaine, alcohol, caffeine and marijuana. The problem areas were withdrawal, reinforcement, tolerance, dependence, and intoxication. Dependence was defined as;
How difficult it is for the user to quit, the relapse rate, the percentage of people who eventually become dependent, the rating users give their own need for the substance and the degree to which the substance will be used in the face of evidence that it causes harm.
Cannabis was given the lowest dependence, withdrawal and tolerance rating of all six drugs including caffeine. (New York Times, August 2nd, 1994, B6)
CONCLUSION: CAFFEINE PROHIBITION IS ON THE WAY!
The facts seem to indicate that caffeine does cause harm – far more, in fact, “than was first believed”. It “provokes erratic behavior in the user or abusive user”. “Accidents” involving “complex machinery” could happen. A “vulnerable person” such as an adolescent, may become a chronic user and hurt themselves from the act of drinking a few cups and then popping a few wake-up pills.
And as we all know from pot, the freedom to use caffeine “does not constitute a matter of fundamental personal importance”. “It is for Parliament to determine what level of risk is acceptable and what level of risk requires action”. All these arguments are taken from the Clay, Caine and Malmo-Levine court cases – all arguments used against cannabis relegalization.
THE LESSON FROM ALCOHOL PROHITION: DON’T CRIMINALIZE RISK!
There is a lesson to be learned from alcohol prohibition. The lesson is that prohibition of not-directly-harmful-to-others activities always means Al Capone, and Al Capone always carries a price higher than the costs of the education and regulation of the pleasurable activity one wishes to, at first, prohibit. It was summed up nicely in Frank W. Anderson’s “The Rum Runners”, where he concluded the book with the following wisdom:
It is true that the occasional “town drunk” is seen in Calgary, Lethbridge and Edmonton, but this seems a small price to pay in contrast with the tension, the ever-present threat of violence, and the indignity that the average citizen was once forced to endure to obtain liquor.
CANADA – LEADING THE WAY THEN AND NOW
Canada was the first one in North America to learn the lessons of alcohol prohibition. The author believes it is Canada’s role to be the first on the continent to apply those lessons to cannabis prohibition. Giving our representatives the power to decide what is too risky for us to attempt is the wrong place to draw the line.
The line should be drawn at harm to others. Clear, significant, easy-to-demonstrate harm. The only “action” that our leaders have a legitimate role in when it comes to risk to self, is education and regulation. The police make lousy teachers and even worse doctors.
The anti-pot politicians keep speaking about an “increase” in cannabis use after relegalization, as if that’s such a bad thing. The good news behind an increase in cannabis use may not only be the savings to our healthcare system from a decrease in alcohol, tobacco and pill consumption, but additional savings from a decrease in caffeine consumption.
David Malmo-Levine, Cannabis Consultant, Spring 2002
“…nine big U.S. banks paid $32.6 billion in bonuses in 2008, while receiving $175 billion in taxpayer funds. In the first half of this year, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. has already boosted compensation and benefits by 33%, setting aside a record $11.4 billion for such payments. And Citigroup and Bank of America have just formally asked the government’s permission to pay bonuses to their most senior executives…”
“…Congress can do much more to ensure that companies act more responsibly on executive compensation by taking a simple, straightforward step: eliminating the tax break for irresponsibly high CEO pay…”
“…By eliminating the deduction for any compensation above $1 million, they can simplify the tax code, abolish the taxpayer subsidy for irresponsible compensation and restore bonuses and stock options to their original purpose of rewarding good performance rather than as a means to avoid paying taxes…”
READ MORE @ New York Daily News
Rush Limbaugh, as always, proves himself to be not only insensitive and rude, but illogical as well.
He has stated only positive things that the Democrats and the Nazis have in common: understanding the problems of big business, being against pollution, helping to keep people working, and improving infrastructure.
He could not, of course, claim that Democrats support the death of innocent people, as the Nazis did. If anything, they support the life of people, by wanting them to have health care more than Republicans, by supporting alternative energy more than Republicans, and by being more against wars for oil than Republicans.
Socialism and Fascism are not the same. Republicans media pundits, bloggers, town hall disturbers, and other constituents forget this.
The policies of liberal democrats are socialist, in that they believe that the wealth that the rich have redistributed to themselves through inflation (raising prices faster than wages, salaries, and benefits) should be re-redistributed back to the workers who made the rich rich, if only enough to keep them alive and healthy.
It is, as always, the Republicans who are the fascists, and much more like the Nazis. If you want proof of this definition, see the entry for fascism at Wikipedia: It details many beliefs that are obviously those of both Nazis and Republicans, but you need only read the first line to see the similarity: “Fascism comprises a radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology and a corporatist economic ideology.”
Look at the facts: Republicans and Nazis love to invade and occupy other countries. Republicans and Nazis care more about the corporation and the country than the individual. Republicans and Nazis like to yell and pound their fists and shout out hateful, fear-mongering propaganda. Republicans, like Nazis, will soon be relegated to the history books as small minded bigots who proved evolutionarily invalid.
see also: Rush Limbaugh slammed for comparing Democrats to Nazis http://jta.org/news/article/2009/08/10/1007145/limbaugh-slammed-for-comparing-democrats-to-nazis/
Canada spends less and helps more people, but are considered comical by U.S. conservatives bribed and lobbied and otherwise financed by private insurance and pharmaceutical companies.
A Canadian doctor diagnoses U.S. healthcare – Los Angeles Times
I think sex should be allowed in nursing homes, as a basic component of human happiness and health, even for elderly people, but many institutions disagree:
Sex bans in nursing homes – Los Angeles Times